<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DaveKawalec.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davekawalec.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davekawalec.com</link>
	<description>People and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes 10: What&#8217;s up with the buttons?</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/itunes-10-whats-up-with-the-buttons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/itunes-10-whats-up-with-the-buttons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the new features of iTunes 10. I love Ping, the new music-centric social network that Apple introduced with the new software. I just have one question: What&#8217;s up with the buttons? If there&#8217;s one thing that&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s speciality it&#8217;s attention to detail in design leading to excellent consistent user experiences. So, then it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/itunes-10-whats-up-with-the-buttons/" title="Permanent link to iTunes 10: What&#8217;s up with the buttons?"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/itunesx_wtf.png" width="180" height="240" alt="Post image for iTunes 10: What&#8217;s up with the buttons?" /></a>
</p><p>I love the new features of iTunes 10. I love Ping, the new music-centric social network that Apple introduced with the new software. I just have one question: What&#8217;s up with the buttons?</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s one thing that&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s speciality it&#8217;s attention to detail in design leading to excellent consistent user experiences. So, then it remains to be seen why Apple would deliberately make the the close/minimize/maximize buttons on iTunes 10 different than on every other piece of software for the Macintosh:<br />
<img src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/safari.png" alt="buttons on safari" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as if it&#8217;s difficult to figure out how to use the new buttons, but they are the wrong size and in the wrong position. The buttons now make me stop and think about where I&#8217;m clicking. Why introduce this nuisance? It&#8217;s very unlike Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/itunes-10-whats-up-with-the-buttons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple says iOS 4.1 fixes slowness with iPhone 3G</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/apple-says-ios-4-1-fixes-slowness-with-iphone-3g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/apple-says-ios-4-1-fixes-slowness-with-iphone-3g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a follow-up to my previous post on fixing iPhone 3G slowness after upgrading to iOS 4.0, I&#8217;m happy to report that at Apple&#8217;s music event today (watch the video here), Steve Jobs announced that iOS 4.1 will permanently fix the bug that caused the iPhone 3G issues. You can check out this post from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/apple-says-ios-4-1-fixes-slowness-with-iphone-3g/" title="Permanent link to Apple says iOS 4.1 fixes slowness with iPhone 3G"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/iOS_4_1_engadget.jpg" width="271" height="180" alt="Post image for Apple says iOS 4.1 fixes slowness with iPhone 3G" /></a>
</p><p>As a follow-up to my previous post on <a href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/3-steps-to-fix-iphone-3g-slowness-after-ios4-upgrade/">fixing iPhone 3G slowness after upgrading to iOS 4.0</a>, I&#8217;m happy to report that at Apple&#8217;s music event today (<a href="http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/1009qpeijrfn/event">watch the video here</a>), Steve Jobs announced that iOS 4.1 will permanently fix the bug that caused the iPhone 3G issues.</p>
<p>You can check out this <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/apple-announces-ios-4-1/">post from Engadget</a> for more info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/09/apple-says-ios-4-1-fixes-slowness-with-iphone-3g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lou Gehrig May Not Have Had Lou Gehrig’s Disease</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/lou-gehrig-may-not-have-had-lou-gehrig%e2%80%99s-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/lou-gehrig-may-not-have-had-lou-gehrig%e2%80%99s-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/lou-gehrig-may-not-have-had-lou-gehrig%e2%80%99s-disease/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[via wired.com The headline reads like something from the Onion, but this article from Wired is an interesting read on the way certain types of brain trauma can be confused for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Maybe we&#8217;ll have to start calling it Stephen Hawking&#8217;s Disease. Posted via email from A Little Slice of Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class='posterous_autopost'>
<div class="posterous_bookmarklet_entry"> <img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/davekawalec/txxmqlpwCpfduuFFEqvJJGHemhrApFoutuoggiIiJFEmxGJfdBeJgpkDfauG/media_httpwwwwiredcom_efeek.jpg.scaled500.jpg" width="233" height="300"/>
<div class="posterous_quote_citation">via <a href="http://www.wired.com/playbook/2010/08/lou-gehrig-disease">wired.com</a></div>
<p>The headline reads like something from the Onion, but this article from Wired is an interesting read on the way certain types of brain trauma can be confused for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Maybe we&#8217;ll have to start calling it Stephen Hawking&#8217;s Disease.</p>
</div>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a>   from <a href="http://davekawalec.posterous.com/lou-gehrig-may-not-have-had-lou-gehrigs-disea">A Little Slice of Dave</a>  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/lou-gehrig-may-not-have-had-lou-gehrig%e2%80%99s-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m a Wikipedia reference (Down the Rabbit Hole)</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/im-a-wikipedia-reference-down-the-rabbit-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/im-a-wikipedia-reference-down-the-rabbit-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 02:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/im-a-wikipedia-reference-down-the-rabbit-hole/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My last blog post is now listed as a reference on the Wikipedia page for the iPhone 3G. So, is that a big deal? I could have just put the link there myself (I didn&#8217;t). I feel pretty good about it, because I posted a tip that fixes a fairly widespread problem that people are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class='posterous_autopost'>
<p><a href='http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2010-08-08/cwfwAsEJvFkmJsuiiCdzerHdmGBnhumEbhqCthyuFmyGIhmDCkfvgofeafCt/wikipedia_ref.png.scaled1000.png'><img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2010-08-08/cwfwAsEJvFkmJsuiiCdzerHdmGBnhumEbhqCthyuFmyGIhmDCkfvgofeafCt/wikipedia_ref.png.scaled500.png" width="500" height="384"/></a> My last <a href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/3-steps-to-fix-iphone-3g-slowness-after-ios4-upgrade/" target="_blank">blog post</a> is now listed as a reference on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone_3G" target="_blank">Wikipedia page for the iPhone 3G</a>. So, is that a big deal? I could have just put the link there myself (I didn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>I feel pretty good about it, because I posted a tip that fixes a fairly widespread problem that people are having. It drove a lot of traffic (for me) to my blog. So, it was gratifying that someone on Wikipedia chose my blog post as the representative reference on the issue. It gave me a sense that what I wrote has some credibility.</p>
<p>But the more I think about it, the more the whole thing seems bizarre.</p>
<p>Can Wikipedia give credibility to my post, when Wikipedia itself is relying on my post to be credible?</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve fallen down the rabbit hole.</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a>   from <a href="http://davekawalec.posterous.com/im-a-wikipedia-reference-down-the-rabbit-hole">A Little Slice of Dave</a>  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/08/im-a-wikipedia-reference-down-the-rabbit-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 steps to fix iPhone 3G slowness after iOS4 upgrade</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/3-steps-to-fix-iphone-3g-slowness-after-ios4-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/3-steps-to-fix-iphone-3g-slowness-after-ios4-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/3-steps-to-fix-iphone-3g-slowness-after-ios4-upgrade/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re like me, you upgraded your iPhone 3G to iOS4 as soon as it was available. Sure, multitasking wasn&#8217;t supported on the 3G, but features like app folders and integrated mailbox were too cool to pass up. Like me (and many others), maybe you also noticed that after the upgrade your iPhone 3G was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class='posterous_autopost'>
<p>If you&#8217;re like me, you upgraded your iPhone 3G to iOS4 as soon as it was available. Sure, multitasking wasn&#8217;t supported on the 3G, but features like app folders and integrated mailbox were too cool to pass up. Like me (and many others), maybe you also noticed that after the upgrade your iPhone 3G was slow, unresponsive, lagging and prone to app crashes. Well, I came across a <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/mobile-gadgeteer/apple-should-advise-against-upgrading-iphone-3g-to-ios4/3640?tag=content;feature-roto" target="_blank">tip</a> that fixed all my performance issues. Thought I&#8217;d pass it along. Maybe it will help you, too:</p>
<ol>
<li>Turn off Spotlight Search: Go to Settings | General | Home Button | Spotlight Search, and uncheck everything</li>
<li>Reboot your iPhone 3G: Just a normal power down and restart</li>
<li>Turn Spotlight Search back on: Go back to same screen as step 1, and re-check everything you unchecked in Step 1</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if there is corruption or a compatibility issue with the Spotlight Search database. Whatever the issue is, this did the trick for me. YMMV, but give it a try. It can&#8217;t hurt.</p>
<p>Let me know in the comments if it works for you, too.</p>
<p><b>UPDATE:</b> I&#8217;ve been reading more about this issue, and wanted to add a bit of information about my upgrade process. It was not a smooth upgrade by any means. In order to get iOS 4.0 working in the first place, I had to first sync my iPhone 3G, and do a backup. Then I had to do a restore install of iOS 4.0 and sync my apps and data back to the iPhone. After that, I did a hard reboot of the 3G. I didn&#8217;t do the above steps for Spotlight Search until some time after I upgraded again to iOS 4.0.1. Some people have been saying that the restore install and/or hard reboots have improved their iPhone 3G performance. My performance definitely did not improve until after I turned Spotlight Search off and back on. However, it&#8217;s possible that the restore install and/or hard reboot played a role in fixing my phone as well.</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a>   from <a href="http://davekawalec.posterous.com/3-steps-to-fix-iphone-3g-slowness-after-ios4">A Little Slice of Dave</a>  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/3-steps-to-fix-iphone-3g-slowness-after-ios4-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giving Posterous a Try</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/giving-posterous-a-try/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/giving-posterous-a-try/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/giving-posterous-a-try/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been looking for a way to consolidate push out messages and links to all of my various social media accounts like Facebook, Twitter, FriendFeed and my personal blog at DaveKawalec.com. It looks like Posterous might fit the bill. It seems to be great for those things that are bit shorter than a blog post [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class='posterous_autopost'>I&#8217;ve been looking for a way to consolidate push out messages and links to all of my various social media accounts like Facebook, Twitter, FriendFeed and my personal blog at DaveKawalec.com. It looks like Posterous might fit the bill. It seems to be great for those things that are bit shorter than a blog post and longer than a tweet. My friend Frank is using Posterous to host his blog (<a href="http://www.frankneill.com/)">www.frankneill.com/)</a>, and I love what Guy Kawasaki is doing with Holy Kaw (<a href="http://holykaw.alltop.com/)">http://holykaw.alltop.com/)</a> through Posterous. So, I figure it&#8217;s time to give it a shot.
<p /> I think I&#8217;ve disabled most of the other auto-post mechanisms that link my stuff together now. But, if you see a few duplicate posts here and there, please forgive me while I work out the kinks.
<p /> &#8211; Dave
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a>   from <a href="http://davekawalec.posterous.com/giving-posterous-a-try-0">A Little Slice of Dave</a>  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/07/giving-posterous-a-try/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words are Important: 800-pound Gorilla</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/06/words-are-important-800-pound-gorilla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/06/words-are-important-800-pound-gorilla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words are Important The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/06/words-are-important-800-pound-gorilla/" title="Permanent link to Words are Important: 800-pound Gorilla"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/gorilla_small.jpg" width="180" height="240" alt="The 800-pound Gorilla" /></a>
</p><h2>Words are Important</h2>
<p>The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world is lost. So, in the interest of saving the world, I humbly present my fifth installment of this series on words:</p>
<h2>800-pound Gorilla</h2>
<h3>What it means</h3>
<p>This is a metaphor for any person with enough clout to ignore all rules, restrictions and conventions.</p>
<p><i>Where does an 800-pound gorilla sit?</i><br />
Wherever it wants.</p>
<h3>How it&#8217;s used</h3>
<p>Recently, the 800-pound gorilla metaphor has been blended with &#8220;the elephant in the room&#8221; to become &#8220;the 800-pound gorilla in the room&#8221;. The elephant in the room is the big obvious problem that everyone is ignoring. Perhaps it&#8217;s being ignored because it&#8217;s a difficult problem to solve, or it would be politically indelicate to address, or would require a radical change in approach to deal with it. In those cases it&#8217;s often more convenient for people to simply look the other way and pretend the problem doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>My father had big, loud, hacking coughs from smoking for years right up until the day he died from lung cancer. Nobody ever really talked about that in my house.</p>
<p>The implication of cross-breeding the elephant with the 800-lb gorilla is that there nothing that can be done about powerful people or entities that throw their weight around. They are inevitable, and so it&#8217;s probably easier to try to get on with life as if they don&#8217;t exist. I blame this usage mostly on the moronic advertising team for <a href="http://adland.tv/commercials/axa-equitable-800-pound-gorilla-elevator-2008-30-usa" target="_new">AXA Equitable</a>.</p>
<h3>Why it&#8217;s important</h3>
<p>We should be able to distinguish between large problems caused by opportunistic bullies and large problems that are merely uncomfortable or difficult to deal with. For example, in dealing with the Gulf oil spill, BP&#8217;s proposed solutions seem to be focused on maintaining the viability of the well rather than on quickly stopping the flow of oil. Though they possess enormous wealth, they certainly seem to be taking their sweet time, pursuing fixes in serial, rather than in parallel, always trying the least costly and drastic first instead of moving immediately to the most promising methods. We&#8217;re all on their timetable.</p>
<p><i>How does an 800-pound gorilla clean up an oil spil?</i><br />
However it wants.</p>
<p>Why is President Obama taking so long to figure out &#8220;whose ass to kick&#8221;? That, my friends, is the elephant in the room.</p>
<p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Male_silverback_Gorilla.JPG">Image</a> by Raul654</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/06/words-are-important-800-pound-gorilla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words are Important: Technically</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-technically/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-technically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 20:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words are Important The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-technically/" title="Permanent link to Words are Important: Technically"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/mechanic_small.jpg" width="240" height="240" alt="Post image for Words are Important: Technically" /></a>
</p><h2>Words are Important</h2>
<p>The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world is lost. So, in the interest of saving the world, I humbly present my fourth installment of this series on words:</p>
<h2>Technically</h2>
<h3>What it means</h3>
<p>Having practical knowledge of a specialized field, usually something scientific or mechanical.</p>
<p>&#8220;Having been an auto mechanic for thirty years, Charlie is technically skilled. He can fix any car you bring into his shop.&#8221;</p>
<h3>How it&#8217;s used</h3>
<p>Somehow, the word &#8220;technically&#8221; has gotten sort of mashed up with the meaning of the word &#8220;technicality&#8221;. A  technicality is something like &#8220;a distinction that only means something important to an expert&#8221;. But it goes further than that. &#8220;Technically&#8221; has somehow morphed into meaning &#8220;a kind of a thing, that really isn&#8217;t that kind of a thing because most people mistake it for another kind of a thing, and the popular opinion is the one that really matters.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;A tomato is technically a fruit.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Why it&#8217;s important</h3>
<p>The implication here is that if enough people make a dumb mistake, it ceases to become a mistake, and instead becomes a fact. Enough people think that tomatoes are vegetables so they somehow enter a state where they <i>really</i> are vegetables even if they <i>technically</i> are fruit.</p>
<p>You eat tomatoes in a salad, and salads have vegetables, so tomatoes must be vegetables. Everyone knows that.</p>
<p>Of course, tomatoes that aren&#8217;t the only &#8220;vegetables&#8221; that are really fruits. Cucumbers, zucchini, squash, pumpkins &#8230; all fruits. If it has seeds, it&#8217;s a fruit. By definition.</p>
<p>This use of &#8220;technically&#8221; always shows a defect in thinking. Sometimes it&#8217;s used as an apology for being correct (&#8220;Sorry, but technically they speak Portugese in Brazil, not Spanish.&#8221;). I do not know why learned people feel obligated to make these concessions to the ignorant. Other times it&#8217;s a poor attempt to undermine a perfectly reasonable argument (&#8220;Well, maybe technically it&#8217;s on your side of the property line, but you can&#8217;t build a fence on my lawn.&#8221;). But no matter how many people really, really want it to be otherwise, you can&#8217;t collectively wish something into being a fact (although you might technically be suffering from some kind of mass delusion).</p>
<p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Power_house_mechanic_cropped.jpg">Image</a> by Yvwv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-technically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words are Important: Outside the Box</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-outside-the-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-outside-the-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words are Important The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-outside-the-box/" title="Permanent link to Words are Important: Outside the Box"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/theBox.gif" width="240" height="240" alt="Post image for Words are Important: Outside the Box" /></a>
</p><h2>Words are Important</h2>
<p>The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world is lost. So, in the interest of saving the world, I humbly present my third installment of this series on words:</p>
<h2>Outside the Box</h2>
<h3>What it means</h3>
<p>The phrase comes from the so-called &#8220;Nine Dots&#8221; puzzle (pictured above). The challenge of the puzzle is to connect all nine dots using only four straight lines without lifting the pencil from the puzzle. The puzzle can only be solved by drawing lines outside of the bounds of the &#8220;box&#8221; defined by the nine dots.<br />
<img src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/outsideTheBox.gif" alt="Outside the Box" /><br />
In order to solve the puzzle, it is necessary to think &#8220;outside the box.&#8221;</p>
<h3>How it&#8217;s used</h3>
<p>This puzzle was used as a metaphor by management consultants since the 1970&#8242;s, reaching it&#8217;s heyday in the early 1990&#8242;s. Though the &#8220;Nine Dots&#8221; puzzle is rarely heard about anymore, the phrase &#8220;outside the box&#8221; remains a vague synonym for &#8220;problem solving.&#8221; The implication is that our creativity is &#8220;boxed-in&#8221; by conventional thinking.</p>
<h3>Why it&#8217;s important</h3>
<p>The reason why the &#8220;Nine Dots&#8221; puzzle was so effective, and why the phrase caught on as widely as it did, was because it functioned at two levels. The first level was the frustration people felt at trying to solve the puzzle, and the catharsis after seeing that the simple answer was right in front of them the whole time. &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t I see it?&#8221; they would ask themselves. The second level was that it served as a powerful visual metaphor. Our minds were boxed-in by our own preconceptions. There is no box around the dots, but our brain drew one for us anyway, and we were confined by it. It was a powerful Zen-like answer, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t see it because I didn&#8217;t let myself see it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Knowing that you have to think outside the box is a very different thing than being able to think outside the box. Our education system is set up to eschew the notion of questioning anything &#8212; the class materials, the teacher, the principal, the whole system. While certainly knowledge begins by learning the known problems and the known solutions, mastery comes when you gain the ability to unlearn what you know and solve new problems in new ways. But our school lives lead directly into our work lives. The institutions operate under the same credo &#8212; keep your head down and your mouth shut and do what you are told. So, if management was saying &#8220;think outside the box,&#8221; they were doing something very different. Nobody ever got promoted for throwing company policy out the window or telling the boss that his idea wasn&#8217;t going to work.</p>
<p>The promise of thinking &#8220;outside the box&#8221; was only so much talk. Schools didn&#8217;t prepare people to think that way, and companies were compounding the issue in their yearly employee reviews. Commonly, the phrase was shortened to &#8220;out of the box&#8221;, which to me rather connotes something more like &#8220;off the shelf&#8221; &#8212; the opposite of the intended meaning. Inevitably, the call to think &#8220;outside the box&#8221; became a mere platitude until finally the phrase became a cliché and collapsed under the weight of its own irony.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame because the world is getting weirder and weirder, and we need unconventional thinkers now more than ever. But, our educational system is in shambles, and our corporations keep breeding cultures where conventionality is a merit. The situation seems dire and intractable. How can we fix it?</p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;re going to have to think outs&#8230; nah, I can&#8217;t say it.</p>
<p>Images by me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-outside-the-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words are Important: Transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 20:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kawalec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davekawalec.com/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words are Important The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-transparency/" title="Permanent link to Words are Important: Transparency"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://www.davekawalec.com/pix/contact_lens.jpg" width="240" height="180" alt="Post image for Words are Important: Transparency" /></a>
</p><h2>Words are Important</h2>
<p>The business world seems to generate more jargon and buzzwords than goods and services these days. Words are being misused and abused. This is a disaster because words are important. When words can be made to mean anything, they mean nothing. Without precise meaning, we can&#8217;t form rational thought and the world is lost. So, in the interest of saving the world, I humbly present my second installment of this series on words:</p>
<h2>Transparency</h2>
<h3>What it means</h3>
<p>The transparency of an object refers to how well light passes through it without being refracted or otherwise disturbed. The more transparent an object is, the more light passes through, and thus the better you can see objects behind it. Thus, a perfectly transparent object would be invisible.<br />
<h3>How it&#8217;s used</h3>
<p>Transparency is now commonly used to mean a forthright accountability to the public by making your own business practices visible.<br />
<h3>Why it&#8217;s important</h3>
<p>This new use of transparency is the <i>exact opposite</i> of the true meaning of the word!</p>
<p>Even <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transparent">Merriam-Webster</a> has is all screwed up. One of the definitions is &#8220;easily-detected or seen through.&#8221; Folks, these are two mutually exclusive states. If I was trying to avoid being detected, I would prefer to be seen through (Note: all true Star Trek nerds know this is the principle behind the Romulan cloaking device).</p>
<p>With a quarter-million gallons of crude oil being vomited into the Gulf of Mexico per day, people have been screaming for BP to be more transparent. &#8220;Show us the underwater video! Tell us what you&#8217;re doing! Tell us what you intend to pay for! Transparency! We need transparency!&#8221;</p>
<p>To that, I say they have been perfectly transparent. I haven&#8217;t seen them do a damn thing.</p>
<p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Contact_lens.JPG">Image</a> by Bpw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davekawalec.com/2010/05/words-are-important-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
